Yesterday two military orders came into
effect which define, for the first time since the occupation of the
oPt in 1967, Palestinian residents of the Occupied Territories as
“infiltrators” or “illegal aliens” in their land and in their
homes.
Claims made by Israel that family
relations will be taken into account when considering whether or not
to deport a person clash with the military’s official and written
position – as has been presented to the Supreme Court – that when
it comes to decisions on entry, presence or deportation from the West
Bank, “family ties in and of themselves do not constitute
sufficient humanitarian grounds”.
Over the past year, HaMoked: Center for
the Defence of the Individual has petitioned the Supreme Court in a
number of cases in which the military issued orders of deportation to
Gaza against Palestinians who were present in the West Bank and whose
registered address is in the Gaza Strip. In some of the cases, the
justices harshly criticized the deportation and clarified to the
military that the orders were extremely problematic from a legal
standpoint. The military was subsequently forced to revoke the
deportation orders. There is no wonder, then, that in the last few
months the military managed - or preferred, in light of the criticism
directed against it – to deport to the Gaza Strip only five
individuals. There is no doubt that the new order was meant, inter
alia, to serve as a way to circumvent the Supreme Court in
order to facilitate, allow and sanction deportation in similar cases
in the future.
The military’s attempts to explain
and clarify the manner in which it intends to apply the new orders –
and as such to clarify, for instance, that it does not intend to
apply them to settlers – attest to the fact that the orders’
vague wording is entirely open to arbitrary interpretation in
accordance with changing policies and political considerations.
Moreover, defining a person as an
infiltrator renders him criminally liable. Not only might all
Palestinians living in the West Bank be removed from it, but now they
also find themselves suddenly declared criminals who may be sentenced
to lengthy jail terms despite having done nothing wrong and having
always acted lawfully.
The military’s statements indicate
that Israel does not currently intend to use the orders in a sweeping
manner for the purpose of mass deportation of residents of the
Territories, however, the orders’ severity and utter unlawfulness
stem primarily from the very fact that they allow such actions now or
in the future.
In accordance with international law, a
person’s right not to be deported from his home and his place of
residence is a central and substantive fundamental right. The Fourth
Geneva Convention imposes a complete ban on forced removal of
civilians from their homes, a prohibition whose violation is
considered a grave violation of the Convention. We call on all state
parties to the Convention to take immediate action to have the Order
regarding Prevention of Infiltration (Amendment No. 2) and the Order
regarding Security Provisions (Amendment No. 112) revoked.
For more details: Att. Elad Cahana of
HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual, 0545-800819
To view background material and the
orders: http://www.hamoked.org.il/news_main_en.asp?id=904
No comments:
Post a Comment